Feature Requests

Would love to have a HatzAI desktop app that connects to everything on my laptop so that I can reference things and take action in apps, shell scripts, etc.

Problem: Currently, when a client wants to share a workflow (or other Workshop item) with their MSP for collaboration, the only available option is to share it with their entire organization. This forces visibility across the client's whole tenant, which isn't ideal for sensitive or in-progress work. Current Process: Share the item organization-wide (exposing it to all users in their tenant), or Add MSP users as users in their tenant (consuming seats and requiring manual user management) Requested Feature: Add the ability for a client user to share Workshop items directly to a specific MSP tenant from the Share Settings menu, without requiring the item to be visible to their entire organization. Expected Benefit: Simplifies cross-tenant collaboration workflows Allows secure, targeted sharing for MSP assistance on in-progress work Reduces the need for workarounds or extra license seats Improves the MSP support experience when helping clients build workflows Use Case: An MSP wants to help a client build a workflow. The client can directly share the workflow with the MSP's tenant so the MSP team can access and edit it from their admin console—without exposing it to the client's entire organization.

At the moment this is only available to the MSP admin, but allowing the tenant admin access to configure custom roles and permissions beyond the basic Chat Only, General and workshop users. On our Tenant I have setup some custom roles that nearly are identical to the normal permissions with the exception of the group administrator, a specifically designed role that I can give to a Department head or manager that they can administer the groups etc. but not be able to adjust any of the tenant settings.

There does not seem to be a way to move assets for an employee to a different person when their employment is terminated (in a similar way that Onedrive move, shared mailbox, password vault migrations etc) and there does not seem to be a way to even see if someone has agents and workshop items that the business could be relying on. Please provide the ability to move resources to a different user. Ideally this would function the same way that Keeper or Onedrive does, where all assets show up under a FromUserX tag/folder.

We need some sort of custom user experience. Being able to pin apps, workflows or agents to it would be great! If admin's could construct homepage templates per tenant would be cool as well. I want to be able to create an AI toolset for clients.

As an MSP when I look at the Hatz.AI invoice, I am unable to determine which line item is for which client. It becomes a hassel to map the licenses to the clients. Need the ability to have the tenant names in the invoice so I can bill my clients appropriately.

Currently, Hatz's SSO implementation is limited to a single domain. Customers with multiple domains require the ability to configure SSO across all their domains. This request is that Hatz add multi-domain support to its SSO implementation.

The Hatz chat interface loses too much vertical space to fixed UI elements before any typing happens, and the effect compounds when attachments are involved. Specific issues: -The top bar takes a fixed chunk of screen height regardless of window size. -When a chat has attachments, the attachment preview area can take up roughly a third of the visible screen, even before I've typed a message. -Combined, this leaves a noticeably smaller reading area for actual chat content compared to other LLM platforms (ChatGPT, Claude.ai , etc.), where the chrome/header area is closer to a fifth of the screen, leaving the rest for text. -This is worse in a browser tab (no desktop app currently exists for Hatz), since browser chrome (address bar, tabs, bookmarks bar) stacks on top of Hatz's own UI overhead, compounding the cramped feeling. Net effect: reading and reviewing longer chats, especially ones with attachments, is harder than it needs to be. The ratio of "UI chrome" to "actual content" is worse than competing platforms. I think you could resolve this by moving UI elements around on the page so it is utilizing the space more efficiently, notably the sides of the screen are not used much in this platform.

Heavy users of other LLMs will want a seamless integration from their personal AI of choice into Hatz. Currently there is no migration at all. Processes are extremely manual. Most LLMs have built in channels for digesting context and chat feeds from other LLMs.